Exponents 3 and 4 of Fermat’s Last Theorem and the Parametrisation of Pythagorean Triples
نویسنده
چکیده
This document gives a formal proof of the cases n = 3 and n = 4 (and all their multiples) of Fermat’s Last Theorem: if n > 2 then for all integers x, y, z: x + y = z =⇒ xyz = 0. Both proofs only use facts about the integers and are developed along the lines of the standard proofs (see, for example, sections 1 and 2 of the book by Edwards [Edw77]). First, the framework of ‘infinite descent’ is being formalised and in both proofs there is a central role for the lemma gcd(a, b) = 1 ∧ ab = c =⇒ ∃ k : |a| = k. Furthermore, the proof of the case n = 4 uses a parametrisation of the Pythagorean triples. The proof of the case n = 3 contains a study of the quadratic form x + 3y. This study is completed with a result on which prime numbers can be written as x + 3y. The case n = 4 of FLT, in contrast to the case n = 3, has already been formalised (in the proof assistant Coq) [DM05]. The parametrisation of the Pythagorean Triples can be found as number 23 on the list of ‘top 100 mathematical theorems’ [Wie]. This research is part of an M.Sc. thesis under supervision of Jaap Top and Wim H. Hesselink (RU Groningen). The author wants to thank Clemens Ballarin (TU München) and Freek Wiedijk (RU Nijmegen) for their support. For more information see [Oos07].
منابع مشابه
Fermat’s Proof
Mathematics most famous marginal note is Fermat’s assertion of what is now called Fermat’s Last Theorem. This was made in his edition of Arithmetica by Diophantus, which had recently been translated from Greek to Latin, the common language of science and all forms of learning. Fermat’s note was also in Latin, and translates roughly as follows: “It is impossible for a cube and a cube to give a c...
متن کاملFermat’s Last Theorem after 356 Years
The purpose of this expository lecture is to explain the basic ideas underlying the final resolution of “Fermat’s Last Theorem” after 356 years as a consequence of the reported establishment by Andrew Wiles of a sufficient portion of the “Shimura-Taniyama-Weil” conjecture. As these notes are being written, the work of Wiles is not available, and the sources of information available to the autho...
متن کاملNon-euclidean Pythagorean Triples, a Problem of Euler, and Rational Points on K3 Surfaces
We discover suprising connections between three seemingly different problems: finding right triangles with rational sides in a non-Euclidean geometry, finding three integers such that the difference of the squares of any two is a square, and the problem of finding rational points on an algebraic surface in algebraic geometry. We will also reinterpret Euler’s work on the second problem with a mo...
متن کاملThe generalized Fermat equation
This article will be devoted to generalisations of Fermat’s equation x + y = z. Very soon after the Wiles and Taylor proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem, it was wondered what would happen if the exponents in the three term equation would be chosen differently. Or if coefficients other than 1 would be chosen. We discuss the reduction of the resolution of such equations to the determination of rationa...
متن کاملAn Extension of the Fundamental Theorem on Right-angled Triangles
{3, 4, 5} is perhaps the most famous Pythagorean Triple with interest in such triples dating back many thousands of years to the ancient people of Mesopotamia. In this article, we shall consider such triples, with the restriction that the elements of these triples must not have any common factors they are Primitive Pythagorean Triples (PPTs). In particular, we shall consider the question of how...
متن کامل